User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SonyEricssonU5i)UC AppleWebkit(like Gecko) Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
UC Browser Series60 Gecko Sony EricssonVivazmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSeries60 Sony EricssonVivazmobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Sony EricssonVivazfeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close SonyEricssonU5icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U5icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Series60 Sony EricssonVivazmobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:15 | by ThaDafinser