User agent detail

PhilipsX620/07 Release/22.11.2007 Browser/wap2.0 Sync/SyncClient1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsX620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PhilipsX620 07closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close PhilipsX620mobile-browseryescloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
PhilipsX620smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close PhilipsX620closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PhilipsX620mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:15 | by ThaDafinser