User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C3520/C3520JPKK2 NetFront/4.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
NetFront 4.1 NetFront SamsungGT-C3520smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-C3520 C3520JPKK2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1closeJVM SamsungGT-C3520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront SamsungGT-C3520smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.1close SamsungGT-C3520closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 SamsungGT-C3520mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 4.1close SamsungGT-C3520Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:15 | by ThaDafinser