User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051105 Galeon/1.3.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Galeon 1.3.21FreeBSD Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7FreeBSD Desktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Galeon 1.3.21closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Galeon 1.3Gecko FreeBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Galeon 1.3.21closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Galeon 1.3.21closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Galeon 1.3.21closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Galeon 1.3.21Gecko 20051105FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Galeon 1.3.21Gecko 1.7.12FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:14 | by ThaDafinser