User agent detail

Opera/9.5 (Microsoft Windows; PPC; Opera Mobi/1938; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.5Windows Mobile mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.5Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows HTCP3702mobile-browseryescloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.5Presto Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.5 Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close HTCP3702Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:14 | by ThaDafinser