User agent detail

Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/5.1.24702/29.3757; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/header-wap.yaml
Opera Mini 5.1 mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.50Presto 2.0 Desktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.24702closeJVM OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.24702close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.24702close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.24702close closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.24702 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.05901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:13 | by ThaDafinser