User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WKC) AppleWebKit/534.50 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Safari/534.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1Windows 7Webkit 534.50desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1WebKit 534.50Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1Webkit 534.50Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.3closeen_US Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:13 | by ThaDafinser