User agent detail

YahooMobile/1.0 (mail; 1.3.8.9816); (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; htc_glacier Build/GINGERBREAD_MR1);
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCglacier Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
YahooMobile 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4T-MobilemyTouch 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCglaciersmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCglaciercloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yahoo Mail 1.3.8 Android 2.3.4T-MobilemyTouch 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:13 | by ThaDafinser