User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; BREW 3.1.5; en )/800x480 Samsung SCH-U960
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-U960 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Brew 3.1SamsungSCH-U960smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeBREW 3.1.5SamsungSCH-U960closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.19 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.421 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Brew 3.1.5SamsungSCH-U960mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSCH U960Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:13 | by ThaDafinser