User agent detail

MOT-A1200eam/1.0/R541L7_16R_Perfectron.III Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Linux; A1200eam; 781) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.00 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA1200eam Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 8.00Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.00Presto GNU/Linux MotorolaA1200eamsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.3.0.0.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.0closeLinux MotorolaA1200eamcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.00 Linux MotorolaA1200eammobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet closeLinux MotorolaA1200eamFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:12 | by ThaDafinser