User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ300a/R2BA SEMC-Browser/4.0.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ300a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC 4.0 SymbianOS SonyEricssonJ300aMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ300a R2BAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SEMC Browser 4.0.3closeJVM SonyEricssonJ300amobile-browseryescloseclose0.276 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SEMC-Browser 4.0 Sony EricssonJ300afeature phoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
SEMC-Browser 4.0close SonyEricssonJ300acloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SEMC-Browser 4.0.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.158 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J300acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SEMC Browser 4.0.3 Sony EricssonJ300amobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonJ300aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:12 | by ThaDafinser