User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; ru; DIGMA iDsD10 3G Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.7.5.418 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.7Android 4.1unknown DigmaiDsD10 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U3 Android 4.1DigmaiDsD10 3GTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7WebKit Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.5closeAndroid 4.1.1DIGMA iDsD10 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.113 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.5.418WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.1DigmaiDsD10tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:11 | by ThaDafinser