User agent detail

Mozzila/5.0(Linux; Android 4.4.2; ru-ru; Fly IQ4415 Quad Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36(KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeAndroid 4.4.2FlyIQ441 Radiancemobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4FlyIQ4415smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2FlyIQ4415 Quadcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.098 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Blink Android 4.4.2FlyIQ441 Radiancemobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:11 | by ThaDafinser