User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ME173X Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.92 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 30.0.1599.92Android 4.2.2Blink AsusMeMO Pad HD 7tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMemo Pad HD7Tabletyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.313 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2AsusMeMO Pad HD 7tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.2.2AsusME173Xcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.2.2AsusMemoPad HD 7tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 26closeAndroid 4.2AsusME173XTabletyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:11 | by ThaDafinser