User agent detail

4G Explorer/3.2.0 (Linux;Android 4.4.2,HTC 801e) AppleWebKit/533.1 (354439050552654,01)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
4G Explorer 3.2.0Android 4.4.2Webkit 533.1HTCOnemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
4G Explorer 3.2.0closeAndroid 4.4.2HTCOnemobile-browseryescloseclose0.249 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4HTC801esmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2HTC801ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 4.4.2HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
4G Explorer 3.2.0Webkit 533.1Android 4.4.2HTCOnemobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:10 | by ThaDafinser