User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Firefox/6.0 Google (+https://developers.google.com/+/web/snippet/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-122.php
yesGoogle Web SnippetBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Web SnippetBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGooglebot snippetclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 6.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglePlusBotclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 6.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Google+ Snippet Fetcher Gecko 20110814Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.368 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:09 | by ThaDafinser