User agent detail

SonyEricssonW950i/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 598) Opera 8.65 [ru]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.65UIQ Sony EricssonW950mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonW950ifeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonW950icloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.119 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W950icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.65 UIQ Sony EricssonW950mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonW950iFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:09 | by ThaDafinser