User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 1193.117.0) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/16.0.912.66 Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome 16Chrome OS Webkit 535.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 16.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 16.0WebKit Chrome OS 1193.117desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeChrome OS 16.0.912.66closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 16.0.912closeChrome OS 1193.117.0closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeChrome OS 1193.117.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.167 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 16.0.912.66WebKit 535.7ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 16Webkit 535.7Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.66closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:08 | by ThaDafinser