User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Sony; KDL55NX725; PKG4.012EUA; 2011;);; en) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.00GNU/Linux Presto SonyKDL55NX725tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL55NX725tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSony 2011SonyKDL55NX725closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0Presto 2.7.61Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonyBravia NX725 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:08 | by ThaDafinser