User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+; CNS_UA; LG Browser/4.05; AD_LOGON=4C47452E4E4554; HbbTV/1.1.1 (;LG Electronics;;;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG Electronics Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.289 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux Philips55PUS780912tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux LG Electronicscloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.119 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.26Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 4.05Webkit 534.26 LGtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:08 | by ThaDafinser