User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Windows; U; wds 7.10; xx; HTC; Radar C110e) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.1.1.343 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
UC Browser 3.1Windows Phone 7.5Gecko HTCRadarmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.1U2 WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows HTCRadarmobile-browseryescloseclose0.236 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.1 Windows HTCRadar C110esmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.1.1closeWindows Phone 7.10HTCRadar C110ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.1.1.343 Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.1Gecko Windows Phone 7.5HTCRadarmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 3closeWindows Phone 7.5HTCRadarSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:08 | by ThaDafinser