User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.90 Safari/537.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Chrome 21.0MacOSX 10.5unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 21.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.06701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.90closeOS X 10.5.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 21.0WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.90closeOS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 21.0.1180closeMac OS X 10.5.8closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.90closeOS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.90WebKit 537.1Mac OS X 10.5.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 21Webkit 537.1Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.90closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:08 | by ThaDafinser