User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; NokiaC2-03/07.48; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.2.0.0.33
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaC2-03 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.2Gecko SymbianOS NokiaC2Mobile Phoneyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.2Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 NokiaC2-03smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 07.48;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.2.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaC2-03closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.2.0.0.33Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia C2-03closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.2.0Gecko Series40 NokiaC2-03mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 5.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaC2-03Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:07 | by ThaDafinser