User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Maxthon/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Maxthon 4.0Win10 6.4unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 4.0WebKit Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.08101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon 4.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.223 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 4.0WebKit Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 4.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.08 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 4.0WebKit 537.36Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.436 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 4.0Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:07 | by ThaDafinser