User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ Ubuntu/10.10 (2.30.6-1ubuntu5) Epiphany/2.30.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Epiphany 2.30.6Ubuntu 10.10WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Epiphany 2.30WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 2.30.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 2.30WebKit Ubuntu 10.10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 2.30.6closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 2.30.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 2.30.6WebKit 534.26Linux 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 2.30.6Webkit 534.26Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0closeX11 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:06 | by ThaDafinser