User agent detail

HTTP_Request2/2.1.1 (http://pear.php.net/package/http_request2) PHP/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library phpUNKNOWN misc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesPEAR HTTP_Request2Bot/Crawler0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTTP closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
HTTP_Request2 2.1.1closeLinux software-librarycloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
PHP 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPHPclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library phpcloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:05 | by ThaDafinser