User agent detail

OpenBSD ftp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yesOpenBSD ftpBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesOpenBSD ftpBot/Crawler0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
OpenBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OpenBSD closeclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:05 | by ThaDafinser