User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-U900L/1.0 NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-U900L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-U900L 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungSGH-U900Lmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungSGH-U900Lsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH-U900Lcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.399 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungSGH-U900Lmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSGH-U900LFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:05 | by ThaDafinser