User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.107 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1326.63
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 19.0Windows XPBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 19.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1326.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 19.0.1326.63closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 19.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1326.63closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 19.0.1326closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.107closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 19.0.1326.63WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 19.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1326.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:04 | by ThaDafinser