User agent detail

MOT-V26X/00.62 UP.Browser/6.2.3.2.m.1.100 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/6.2.3.17.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV26X Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V26X 00.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.2.m.1.100close MotorolaV260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaV26Xsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close MotorolaV26Xcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.2.3.2.m.1.100 MotorolaMotorola V26Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaV26Xmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV260Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:04 | by ThaDafinser