User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; U; xx) Presto/2.9.219 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.00Linux Presto 2.9.219desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.1 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.9.219Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.00Presto 2.9.219Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:03 | by ThaDafinser