User agent detail

Opera/9.52 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.52Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.52Presto 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.52closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.52Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.52closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.52closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.52closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.52 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.52 Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.52closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:03 | by ThaDafinser