User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; e2001_v89_gq2008s Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Xianghee2001_v89 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.1.2Alpse2001_v89_gq2008smobile-browseryescloseclose0.328 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.1.2Xianghee2001_v89closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.1.2e2001_v89_gq2008smobile:smartyescloseclose0.09301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.1Alpse2001_v89_gq2008sSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:02 | by ThaDafinser