User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; GT-S8530 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S8530 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGT-S8530smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2SamsungGT-S8530closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Blink Android 4.4.2SamsungWave IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.10501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:02 | by ThaDafinser