User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux 2.6.32; xx;) AppleWebKit/534(KHTML, like Gecko) NX/2.1 (DTV; HTML; R1.0;) InettvBrowser/2.2 (38E08E;0014GAIAV3;001;000) Hybridcast/1.0 (;38E08E;0014GAIAV3;001;000;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/mitsubishi.yaml
NetFront NX 2.1 Webkit 534MitsubishiSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront NX 2.1close media-playercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 0014GAIAV3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2WebKit 534Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 2.1Webkit 534 MitsubishiSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:02 | by ThaDafinser