User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Nokia 6620/2.14.1; 9399) Opera 8.65 [en-US]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Nokia6620smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS Nokia6620closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.65 Nokia6620desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia6600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:01 | by ThaDafinser