User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T528g/T528UDKE4[TF355314045027030009640018153425713] Dolfin/1.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Dolfin 1.5JAVA unknownunknown SamsungSGH-T528gMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 1.5WebKit JAVA SamsungSGH-T528gMobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-T528g T528UDKE4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 1.5close SamsungSGH-T528Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungSGH-T528gsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungSGH-T528gcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.5 Touchwiz 2.0SamsungStraight Talkmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH-T528GFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:00 | by ThaDafinser