User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.6 (SAMSUNG GT-C3212i)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-C3212i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.6close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGT-C3212ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.6close SamsungGT-C3212icloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.6 SamsungGT-C3212imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:33:00 | by ThaDafinser