User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Opera 25.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.15302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.101closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 25.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:59 | by ThaDafinser