User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.1; ru; Lenovo_A3000-H) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.9.0.543 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.9Android 4.2unknown LenovoIdeaTab A3000-HTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.9U2 Android 4.2LenovoIdeaTab A3000-HTabletyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.9 Android 4.2LenovoA3000-Hsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.9.0closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA3000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.9.0.543 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.9Gecko Android 4.2.1LenovoIdeaTab A3000tabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:58 | by ThaDafinser