User agent detail

Dr.Web anti-virus Light Version: 7.00.11.7032 Device model: HTC Rhyme S510b Firmware version: 2.3.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCRhyme S510b Firmware version: 2.3.5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dr closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCRhyme S510b Firmware version: 2.3.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCRhyme S510bsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCRhyme S510b Firmware version: 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dr. Web Light 7.00 Android 2.3.5HTCRhymemobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:58 | by ThaDafinser