User agent detail

LENOVO-I908_CMCC
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoI908_CMCC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LENOVO-I908 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LenovoI908mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LenovoI908 CMCCsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LenovoI908_CMCCcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LenovoI908mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:57 | by ThaDafinser