User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40/3.0FP1; Nokia5310XpressMusic/05; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/0.8.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5310XpressMusic Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 0.8Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia5310XpressMusicsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 05;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 5310close Nokia5310XpressMusiccloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 0.8.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 0.8.3Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5310XpressMusiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 0.8.3Gecko Series40 Nokia5310 XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 0.8closeNokia Series 40 Nokia5310 XpressMusicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:57 | by ThaDafinser