User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; en-us; ViewPad 701N Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ViewsonicViewPad 701N Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2ViewSonicViewPad 701Ntabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.1closeAndroid 4.2.1ViewsonicViewPad 701Ncloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1ViewPad 701Ntabletyescloseclose0.09801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:57 | by ThaDafinser