User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.1; zh-cn; EVO 4G+ Build/FRG83G) UC AppleWebKit/530+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCEVO 4G+ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.0.1HTCRidermobile-browseryescloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.1HTCEVO 4G+closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.16802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 530Android 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 530Android 2.2.2EVO 4G+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0HTCRiderSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:56 | by ThaDafinser