User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.1/Mozilla/5.0 (HW-C8600/C8600V100R001C92B225;U;Android/2.1;320*480;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 2.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 3.1closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.1WebKit Android 2.1yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.1closeAndroid 2.1closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.1WebKit 530.17Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.1Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HuaweiC8600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.04701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:56 | by ThaDafinser