User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 (x86_64)) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/33.0.1750.152 Chrome/33.0.1750.152 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 33.0.1750.152Ubuntu Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 33.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 33.0.1750.152closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 33.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 33.0.1750closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 33.0.1750.152WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 33.0.1750.152Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:56 | by ThaDafinser