User agent detail

samsung-GT-Q999/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/2.3.5 Release/04.24.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-Q999 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-GT-Q999 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungGT-Q999mobile-browseryescloseclose0.32903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGT-Q999smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungGT-Q999closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5SamsungGT-Q999mobile:smartyescloseclose0.14401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:55 | by ThaDafinser