User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; ) Opera, SAMSUNG-B2100/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungB2100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident SamsungB2100smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.0close SamsungB2100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 4.0 SamsungB2100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:55 | by ThaDafinser