User agent detail

Nokia2700c-2-07.80 JConf/CLDC-1.1 JProf/MIDP-2.1 Encoding/ISO-8859-1 Locale/en Lang/ar Caps/348 Morange/6.0.4.110729 Domain/@voda_egypt CJME/110729
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia2700c-2-07 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia2700c-2-07 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia2700 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia2700c-2-07smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser CLDC-1.1closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia2700c-2-07closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2700c-2-07closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia2700 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:55 | by ThaDafinser